Protestantism vs. Catholicism in XVII Century England :: Religion Essays

Protestantism vs. universality in XVII Century EnglandThe incline nation grew increasingly to a greater extent Protestant during the XVII century, while the monarchy moved ever closer to Rome. The wounding train spotterspotting trains of thought kind of than locomotiveswill sure spot a good deal of redundancy in this absolute statement, for it is, beyond doubt, a proclamation framed by the historian rather than the philosopher. The Stuartscertainly some more than otherswere Catholics not in the manner that atomic number 1 VIII took his mid-life faith, but rather in the manner that Elizabeth was always a Protestant. Similarly, the general population of the land viewed their faith as they viewed their nation with pride. We should peradventure initially note that religion was, to those of the 17th century, something cognate to sex to the put day paramour, charity to the philanthropist, money to the niggard it was a serious business. In the seventeenth century, Protesta ntism in England was as safe as houses secure with a firm chronological and doctrinal and popular foundation. Within the larger European context, however, the established National religion was exposed to the rigours of Catholic tempest and seemed distant from fixed. It is in this respect that we might tackle the monarchical populous split. The English Restoration was no minor re-establishment of monarchy it was rather a restatement of the subject field character. Regicide was detestable to mostwe need scarce peruse the emotive power of Macbeth or Hamlet to gain some understanding of the general sentimentand the achievement of Charles I was an extreme act of an extreme sub-minority. The arrival of Charles II, therefore, was not only a restoration of the natural and Godly order, but, in effect, an appeasement of the national conscience a way to bury the crisis of revolution once and for all. With so much at stake, it was no simple task to recreate the caboodle of the revolutio n, but this is precisely what Charles II and James II managed. It is certainly an oversimplification to suggest that this came about solely from religious discord, but similarly it is inconclusive to suggest that this was notif we might resort to religious terminologythe point mover. Charles II had spent much of his life upon the continent, and was, therefore, more a Continental than an Englishman. In terms of religion, particularly, his views were consummately European cosmopolitan and decidedly Catholic.