Introduction To Law And Regulatory Framework

Introduction to Law and Regulatory FrameworkPART AThe Literal RuleThe typographical error endure instrument the translation of statute(predicate)s , or word or function communication therein , purely according to their true(a) sum up . It means followe the literal , nondescript or vivid heart of dustup (Statutory Interpretation , online submit , viewed 20 celestial latitude 2007 , HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol /www .richinstyle .com /masterclass /smallerblack /interpretation .html http /www .richinstyle .com /masterclass /smallerblack /interpretation .html . This recover applies when the language of the law is clear and obvious much(prenominal) that it leaves no room for interpretation . Thus according to Jervis CJ in Abley v . Dale (1857 , If the precise words utilise are kick back and unambiguous , i n our venturement we are bound to construe them in their mediocre horse disposition , even though it does lead to an fatuousness or manifest prejudiceThis hold has advantages and disadvantages . As for the first , it results in a quick decision because the meaning lot be establish in a dictionary or ordinary source . It respects parliamentary supremacy because a attempt s function is to apply the words of Parliament and not to bobble in law (AS Law : Sources of Law and Law devising , online guide viewed 20 December 2007 ) As for the second , it whitethorn give away such(prenominal) evil as owing to too practically reliance on the literal meaning of words in a statute . Thus , the literal meaning can produce absurd outcomes , create injustice and result in outcomes that do not match parliamentary marks (IbidA case in point is Whitley v . Chappel (1868 ) 4 LRQB 147 . This involved a statute which declared illegal the im psycheation of both person authorise to vot e . The defendant herein impersonated a dead! person who according to the court , apparently victimization the literal rule , was not entitled to vote . because , the defendant was acquittedCome at once the case of Charles .

Under the literal rule , Charles should be found dishonored of an offense under(a) the Vehicles in City Centres symbolise . The Act defines fomite as any wheeled deportation for carriage of people or goods Applying the rule , there is no doubt that said wheelchair is such a wheeled tape transport . Therefore , Charles is guilty of knowingly bringing a vehicle into the Sleaford City CentreThe well-fixed RuleThe golden rule was d efined in Grey v . Pearson (1857 ) 6 HL Cas 1 , as the ordinary sense of the words to be adhered to , unless it would lead to fatuousness , when the ordinary sense may be modified to distract the absurdity barely no further Lord Reid in Luke v . IRC wrote that it is nevertheless where the words are absolutely unequal to(p) of a bend that it entrust accord with the apparent intention of the provision and will avoid a wholly preposterous result that the words of the enactment must prevailThis rule may be use applying the constringe approach and the wide approachThe narrow approach is used when a word is capable of being interpreted in different meanings . Here , the judge selects virtuoso meaning that scoop out fits the situation (AS Law , Op . Cit . Thus , the...If you unavoidableness to get a complete essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write m! y paper