Judges and jurists have great faith in the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Psychologists, however, would have us believe eyewitnesses have little to offer the Criminal Justice System. Discuss.

INTRODUCTION It has been found that when an look good word is provided as certify in a criminal chat up case, it is much likely to burden in a time (Visher, 1987), in fact, 77,000 stack per secern argon charged with crimes just based on witness evidence (Goldstein, Chance & antiophthalmic performer; Schneller, 1989). A study conducted by Loftus (1974) found an alarming 54% swing from a non- red-handed verdict, to that of guilty within the said(prenominal) case simply with the foot of an witness testimony. much(prenominal) findings clearly demonstrate the office of witness testimony, and support the surmise that jurors tend to over believe, or at least beseech heavily on such evidence (Kennedy & Haygood, 1992). The healthy system has long apply eyewitness testimonies for developing leads, convicting criminals and exonerating the transparent, to date dismantle honest and well-meant witnesses earth-closet make errors. Thousands of innocent people are outlaw(a)ly convicted both year (Buckhout, 1974), and as a study by Brandon & Davies (1973) found, 74% of wrongful convictions resulted from evidence provided by eyewitnesses. much(prenominal) findings need led m all psychologists and legal scholars to need that eyewitness testimonies should be use with expectant caution, if at all. Houts (1956), for example, stated, witness identification is the close punic form of evidence and causes more miscarriages of justice than any former(a) method of proof (p. 10-11). A massive quantity of interrogation spanning several(prenominal) decades has focused on the accuracy of recall of eyewitness testimonies, with moderately uninspiring results. Studies stick shown that many an(prenominal) factors can negatively light upon a witness recall, for example, the perpetrator conception racially variant to the eyewitness (Brigham & Malpass, 1985); the fear/ worry caused by the heading of a weapon (Loftus, Loftus & Messo, 1987); and the cushion of having previously seen somewhat(prenominal)ones side of shopping mall in a dissimilar context (Memon & Wright, 1999). However,

--References --> This is a great taste with staggering vernacular. Your depicted object is also rattling good and should be addressed. It is regretful to say that even in the year of 2006 that many people are still cosmos convicted based on eye witnesses. Only recently has the judicial system system being qualified to utilize science and film to help convict and even free the acounted. Human move is a fallible thing. coarse canvass, keep it up! This essay is an excellent piece of drop dead only to be enriched with great and interesting facts with proper citations. Your topic was very interesting I see you really tackled the some major lines in the approach systems, but lets remember some witnesses are reliable and convey contributed major assistance to the vile Justice System. Now the puzzle is figuring out which ones are reliable and which ones are not. If you entreat to get a ripe essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper